In a series of articles, the prominent educator and anthropologist makes a lucid criticism of the current "in-school" system proposing a new way of looking at teaching-learning. The author says: "To teach, you have to amaze the learner, who as they try to unveil the mystery, they will learn from the educational perspective who does it right or wrong is secondary regardless of the level of education, whether in kindergarten, elementary or middle school, or university, because the important thing is not to have the correct answers according to school contents, but the formulation of questions, thanks to which you can organize the information on the basis of emerging criteria conceived from the regularities observed that allow you to elaborate an explanatory pattern. I think that as the students make progress at school, especially university, answers are required—and every time, more precise ones—but these must never exceed in quantity or quality, to generate questions—if that happens, the learning process becomes distorted, which becomes merely a routine and lack of mystery."